Page 2 of 2
Re: Bogus rules on the Deck - who is immune?
Posted: Tue Oct 11, 2016 12:24 pm
by cmager
cmager is neither a nom de guerre nor a nom de plume (nor a nom de net). It simply is. Perhaps I should change it to mr. cmager.
Re: Bogus rules on the Deck - who is immune?
Posted: Tue Oct 11, 2016 1:11 pm
by Corey Rossen
cmager wrote:cmager is neither a nom de guerre nor a nom de plume (nor a nom de net). It simply is. Perhaps I should change it to mr. cmager.
Like Madonna, Beyonce, Tiffany, and...
- LO - Cmager.png.jpg (40.99 KiB) Viewed 54679 times
Re: Bogus rules on the Deck - who is immune?
Posted: Tue Oct 11, 2016 1:27 pm
by cmager
Awesome! All highly skilled, highly intelligent, highly accomplished and successful individuals. Thanks so much for the compliment.
VOTE AGAINST 64.
Re: Bogus rules on the Deck - who is immune?
Posted: Tue Oct 11, 2016 1:48 pm
by Corey Rossen
See but here is where it all breaks down in the wide open...
The admins know the rules are bogus.
The founders know the rules are bogus.
The readers all know the rules are bogus.
The admins know who is immune.
The founder knows who is immune.
The immune know they're immune.
The readers see who is immune.
All arrows point to it...yet nothing is being done to fix it and worse, nothing will be done.
And thus, the rules are bogus.