Fitzgerald in Violation of Election Laws

Moderator: Jim DeVito

Stan Austin
Contributor
Posts: 2463
Joined: Tue Mar 15, 2005 12:02 pm
Contact:

Fitzgerald Violated Election Laws

Postby Stan Austin » Mon Nov 05, 2007 9:04 pm

Paid for by Friends of Tom George, 1048 Homewood Drive, Lakewood, Ohio 44107, Lathy Laino, Treasurer. Produced In-House.
BREAKING NEWS Contact: Alan Melamed
November 5, 2007 216.659.6300
OHIO ELECTIONS COMMISSION FINDS LAKEWOOD MAYORAL CANDIDATE
ED FITZGERALD VIOLATED OHIO LAW: 6 OF 7 COUNTS
LAKEWOOD, OH – After a lengthy, nearly 3-hour hearing, the Ohio Elections Commission found
that Lakewood Councilman and Mayoral Candidate Ed FitzGerald violated Ohio law numerous times
by making false statements in campaign material. The Commission’s findings against FitzGerald
include:
 Four violations relating to false statements about an income tax increase, including a statement
that Mayor George is proposing to increase City income taxes by 33% after the election
 A violation for falsely stating that there was a million dollar mistake in budget estimating for
City water projects
 A violation for not having the requiring disclaimers on a campaign video and his website
In response to the news Mayor Tom George said, “We have always wanted this to be a campaign about
the issues facing Lakewood. It is unfortunate that Mr. FitzGerald chose instead to make this a
campaign of outright falsehoods, misrepresentations and scare tactics. Lakewood voters deserve
better.â€Â


Grace O'Malley
Posts: 680
Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2005 8:31 pm

Fitzgerald in Violation of Election Laws

Postby Grace O'Malley » Mon Nov 05, 2007 9:13 pm

BREAKING NEWS
Contact: Alan Melamed
November 5, 2007

OHIO ELECTIONS COMMISSION FINDS LAKEWOOD MAYORAL CANDIDATE
ED FITZGERALD VIOLATED OHIO LAW: 6 OF 7 COUNTS

LAKEWOOD, OH – After a lengthy, nearly 3-hour hearing, the Ohio Elections Commission found that Lakewood Councilman and Mayoral Candidate Ed FitzGerald violated Ohio law numerous times by making false statements in campaign material. The Commission’s findings against FitzGerald include:

Four violations relating to false statements about an income tax increase, including a statement that Mayor George is proposing to increase City income taxes by 33% after the election
A violation for falsely stating that there was a million dollar mistake in budget estimating for City water projects
A violation for not having the requiring disclaimers on a campaign video and his website

In response to the news Mayor Tom George said, “We have always wanted this to be a campaign about the issues facing Lakewood. It is unfortunate that Mr. FitzGerald chose instead to make this a campaign of outright falsehoods, misrepresentations and scare tactics. Lakewood voters deserve better.â€Â


sharon kinsella
Posts: 1490
Joined: Fri May 18, 2007 7:54 am
Contact:

Postby sharon kinsella » Mon Nov 05, 2007 9:13 pm

It means that you should think about this when you go to vote Ivor!


"When I dare to be powerful -- to use my strength in the service of my vision, then it becomes less and less important whether I am afraid." - Audre Lorde
Grace O'Malley
Posts: 680
Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2005 8:31 pm

Postby Grace O'Malley » Mon Nov 05, 2007 9:17 pm

It proves that Ed Fitzgerald is not to be believed.

It proves that Fitzgerald manipulates and distorts the truth.

Is that the kind of person you want as mayor of this great city?


Bill Varkonyi
Posts: 4
Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 8:26 pm

Repercussions?

Postby Bill Varkonyi » Mon Nov 05, 2007 9:19 pm

What (if any) are the repercussions to these findings?


"This damned mold keeps destroying my cultures." ~ Louis Pasteur
Bryan Schwegler
Posts: 963
Joined: Fri Jun 24, 2005 4:23 pm
Location: Lakewood

Postby Bryan Schwegler » Mon Nov 05, 2007 9:29 pm

Ivor Karabatkovic wrote:so what does this mean in terms of tomorrow?


It means nothing. Both candidates are still running, both can be elected. Vote for the best candidate.


Lynn Farris
Posts: 559
Joined: Fri Mar 25, 2005 8:24 pm
Location: Lakewood, Ohio
Contact:

Postby Lynn Farris » Mon Nov 05, 2007 9:30 pm

What does it mean in general is Ed fined - or what?


"Life is not measured by the number of breaths we take, but by the moments that take our breath away." ~ George Carlin
Bryan Schwegler
Posts: 963
Joined: Fri Jun 24, 2005 4:23 pm
Location: Lakewood

Postby Bryan Schwegler » Mon Nov 05, 2007 9:30 pm

OMG....can we PLEASE keep this to one thread?

I've now counted 3 times this was posted by 3 different people.

This election is getting out of control on the deck I swear.
Last edited by Bryan Schwegler on Mon Nov 05, 2007 9:49 pm, edited 1 time in total.


Rick Uldricks

Re: Fitzgerald in Violation of Election Laws

Postby Rick Uldricks » Mon Nov 05, 2007 9:33 pm

deleted
Last edited by Rick Uldricks on Sun Sep 28, 2008 11:25 am, edited 1 time in total.


Bryan Schwegler
Posts: 963
Joined: Fri Jun 24, 2005 4:23 pm
Location: Lakewood

Postby Bryan Schwegler » Mon Nov 05, 2007 9:33 pm

Lynn Farris wrote:What does it mean in general is Ed fined - or what?


Generally yes, these result in a fine.

The alleged violations against George will also be decided soon.


David Scott
Posts: 71
Joined: Mon Apr 24, 2006 4:06 pm

Postby David Scott » Mon Nov 05, 2007 9:39 pm

Is there a violation of journalistic standards with the reporter that covers City Hall makes such blatant partisian comments ?

I think all future coverage of the City by this reporter is now tainted, and its not his first comment like this. If there is an editorial board, how to you separate commentary from reporting ?


what happens to a dream deferred .......

maybe it just sags like a heavy load
or does it explode ?
- Langston Hughes
Mary Breiner
Posts: 14
Joined: Mon Apr 16, 2007 4:04 pm
Location: Lakewood, OH

Fitzgerald in Violation of Election Laws

Postby Mary Breiner » Mon Nov 05, 2007 9:40 pm

It is perfectly appropriate that DL posted a new link now that the commission has ruled. The previous links were way off topic. This post clarifies that indeed laws were violated and citizens reading on the Deck should be aware of this fact. Now, those that would like to comment on THIS late breaking news should feel free to do so.

Thanks,


Mary Breiner


David Lay
Posts: 948
Joined: Sat Oct 15, 2005 8:06 pm
Location: Washington, DC
Contact:

Postby David Lay » Mon Nov 05, 2007 9:40 pm

David Scott wrote:Is there a violation of journalistic standards with the reporter that covers City Hall makes such blatant partisian comments ?

I think all future coverage of the City by this reporter is now tainted, and its not his first comment like this. If there is an editorial board, how to you separate commentary from reporting ?


...for posting a Press Release?


New Website/Blog: dlayphoto.com
Bryan Schwegler
Posts: 963
Joined: Fri Jun 24, 2005 4:23 pm
Location: Lakewood

Postby Bryan Schwegler » Mon Nov 05, 2007 9:42 pm

This has been posted 3 times. It should be combined, it's just obnoxious to have campaigns posting multiple posts about the same topic.

Honestly, it's just poor netiquette.
Last edited by Bryan Schwegler on Mon Nov 05, 2007 9:46 pm, edited 1 time in total.



Return to “2007 Lakewood Mayoral Election”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests