As a member of the Cleveland 911 campaign, I am appalled to have read your article. I remember our encounter well. I would say it started off well; unfortunately it felt like you had no wish to understand our points of interest. You had stated you read Popular Mechanics books and that it answered all your questions. I felt you had failed to research some of the most troubling topics as we spoke. You said to me, "what is the strongest argument you can produce?" I replied "thermite and sulfur found in the steel of the wreckage." You asked if that could be a natural composition of its chemical makeup. I told you that it was not. I asked you if you had ever seen WTC 7 come down and you said you would like to see that. At this point I felt confident that I would have you researching again.

Then things went sour -- voices started to rise, people began feeling attacked personally (both sides included). And I feel like both of us acted inappropriately, which I do not feel was out of context, as this is a topic that has great emotion; for we try to provide a voice to the victim's family members who struggle with this tragedy, trying to have their questions answered. Your first case in point is correct and as we move forward, we strive to set emotion aside and just be scholarly. Your other case points seem to have been skewed.

Case in point 2, we have surveyed that area well, especially since this was the second time we had been in that location promoting a new investigation of 911. Unfortunately we had to keep our sign parallel to the street so that we would not impede pedestrian traffic (police request); that is why our smaller signs were facing the traffic stops. And yes many people stopped, honked, and gave us thumbs up. Also, many stopped to pick up the care package that we pass out with every demonstration, unfortunately you had refused.

Case in point 3, this care package contains a DVD that had multiple documentaries wrapped in our personal flyer with our website (and others) so you can learn more (we passed out 350 that day). From that flyer you can begin your own research, (we do not feel you should take our word as gold, rather research the hard evidence and allow yourself the ability to decide what holds the most weight). We would gladly send you one if you like!

Case in point 4, I feel you have forgotten about the topics I asked you to check out at this point, and are referring to your personal nitpicking of the context of the statements being made. I recall you stating those buildings did not come down in free-fall speed like others in my group had claimed, I said correct, it was virtually free-fall speed. (The speed of South Tower as stated in the 911 commission report 10 seconds. Free-fall speed from the same height of the South Tower 9.2 seconds) Excuse my associates for not placing the .8 seconds of detail. However, I do not consider that to be contradicting. Also, you spoke with associates only no one man is a leader in our street actions. However, I personally would love to have a debate with you on the topic of 911. I believe you would find our case to be quite solid! I have read popular mechanics' propaganda and it does not stand up to the testimonies of Firefighters and First responders.

On Sept 12th, 2001, People magazine interviewed Loui Chaccioli of the fire dept of NYC, he was quoated saying, "I was taking firefighters up in the elevator to the 24th floor to get into position to evacuate workers. On the last trip-up, a bomb went off, we think there were bombs set in the buildings." Even a more striking account from Paul Isaac of the FDNY, "Many firemen know there were bombs in the buildings but they are afraid for their jobs to admit it because the higher-ups forbid discussion of this fact.” "I know 9/11 was an inside job. The police know it's an inside job and the firemen know it too."

To say that anyone who believes the U.S. Government could be directly responsible for those attacks is delusional and in complete disrespect of the victims family members. I hope you do your homework and agree to this debate! As for some credible material you might want to research before you do, please visit Pilots for 911 truth www.pilotsfor911truth.org & Architects and Engineers for 911 truth www.ae911truth.org Thank you,
The Cleveland Campaign for 911 Truth
cleveland911campaign.com