Suddes Column on LLGSF (Library) funding reductions

The jumping off discussion area for the rest of the Deck. All things Lakewood.
Please check out our other sections. As we refile many discussions from the past into
their proper sections please check them out and offer suggestions.

Moderators: Jim DeVito, Dan Alaimo

Jeff Endress
Posts: 858
Joined: Mon Apr 04, 2005 11:13 am
Location: Lakewood

Suddes Column on LLGSF (Library) funding reductions

Postby Jeff Endress » Wed Apr 27, 2005 7:39 am

I attach 4/27 column by Tom Suddes. I believe it is insightful and well directed. It is particularly apropriate vis-a-vis LPL. If anyone has the time, drop a (scathing) letter to Columbus.



Jeff



From downtown Cleveland to deepest Appalachia, Ohio's public libraries are the envy of the United States. But on the apparent theory that there's no failure like success, the General Assembly, with Gov. Bob Taft's connivance, is poised to choke library funding.



Ask anyone who moves out of Ohio, especially parents: One of the first things they miss, besides grandparents left behind, are the fantastic libraries - treasure-houses for children, people's universities for adults, workshops for the very brand of "by-the-bootstraps" self-improvement Ohio's Republicans say they want to promote.



Thanks to a bipartisan General Assembly consensus reaching back to the 1930s, Ohio public libraries are so good that in the 1990s a big national newspaper reported that Pennsylvanians and West Virginians were flocking to such garden spots as Youngstown and Steubenville so their kids could find materials they needed to do homework.



Unfortunately, Taft and Ohio's legislators won't do theirs: Like the pupil in Sam Cooke's "Wonderful World," they don't know much about history.



State support for Ohio's public libraries was the mid-Depression brainchild of "Mr. Republican" himself, then-state Sen. Robert A. Taft, the governor's grandfather, no spendthrift of taxpayers' money. The elder Taft earmarked a stock-and-bond tax to aid public libraries.



In the 1980s, a Public Library Financing and Support Committee, which included another conservative Cincinnatian, future Senate President Richard H. Finan, fine-tuned Taft's legacy.



Taft's library law tended to benefit urban counties, because that's where the stocks and bonds were. Thus, while Greater Clevelanders and other big-city Ohioans often had superb public libraries, small-town, rural, and Appalachian Ohio sometimes did not.



In 1983, legislators set in motion eventual repeal of the stock-and-bond tax. They instead designated a slice of Ohio's income tax for libraries and local governments. The library-study committee, chaired by the late Dennis G. Fedor, a Greater Cleveland lawyer, one of the best friends libraries ever had, helped work out implementation of the tax change.



The Fedor panel wanted to make sure that even residents of poor Ohio counties could build, stock and staff great libraries. The magnificent result, 20 years later: While Ohio's state universities are so-so and its public schools, often as not, founder, the Buckeye State is unquestionably No. 1 in America in libraries - and in very little else, except Statehouse torpor and statewide pessimism.



Of course, in today's Columbus, it's considered un-American to leave well enough alone, especially when there are so many options for risking rather than bolstering a public investment.



So, consider this Statehouse "logic": Libraries are Ohio's most cost-efficient engines for economic (and human) development, as well as Ohio's most popular public service. So, pathetically in Alice-in-Wonderland Columbus, that makes libraries targets rather than trophies.



Here's the plan: Even though Ohio's public libraries haven't gotten their "guaranteed" slice of state income-tax money since 2001, Gov. Taft wants (and the Ohio House has agreed) to sweat 5 cents out of every $1 public libraries might otherwise still manage to coax from the state.



And even forgetting that, Taft's (and the legislature's) plan to prune Ohio's income tax means that even the pre-2001 library-fund guarantee probably would result in a net loss, to libraries, of state aid.



Meanwhile, amid supposedly tight times, Taft wants voters to agree to rack up $500 million in debt for economic "development." Anyone unwise to zany Statehouse ways might wonder why Ohio would sluice cash from a genuine knowledge enterprise (libraries) and use credit cards on a "Third Frontier" quest for gasless cars or genetically engineered corn dogs. Answer: Off-year bond campaigns such as "Third Frontier" generate fees for political consultants and fund-raisers otherwise out of work till the 2006 gubernatorial race heats up.



True, it was the 1991-98 administration of Republican Gov. George V. Voinovich that first monkeyed with state aid to public libraries. That, too, was a grotesque mistake. But Bill Clinton's economy helped bandage that wound by boosting Ohio income-tax collections - and the bigger the collection, the more Ohio libraries might get from Columbus.



Now, Ohio is poised to scuttle one of its few public-service glories. There's a descriptive word for that kind of dim-bulb decision, but it can't be printed in this newspaper. So here's one that can be: Despicable.





Kenneth Warren
Posts: 489
Joined: Sat Mar 26, 2005 7:17 pm

Postby Kenneth Warren » Wed May 04, 2005 5:34 pm

May 3, 2005



Ohio Republicans appear to be united for the most part around Taftís Tax Reform Plan, which will cut the funding to support public libraries and local government entities.



Indeed, there are players in the Republican leadership who are determined to set the stage over the long haul for the eventual elimination of support for public libraries and local government entities.



There has never been anything like the current political environment wherein term-limits and one party rule open the way for special interests to commandeer a tax structure for the benefit of the few.



In Governor Taftís proposed 2006-2007 budget, public library funding is cut 5%. But there are ominous developments and trends to be noticed beyond the surface of a 5% cut as well.



Since the high point funding level reached in 2001, public libraries will have lost approximately 15% of the state support promised when the LLGSF was established to replace the intangibles tax.



The main feature of the Taft Tax reform plan, which will greatly damage Ohioís public libraries, is the 21% personal income tax cut for all brackets.



Because Ohioís public libraries are so dependent on state resources from the income tax, this reform will have devastating consequences. If the Taft Tax Reform package is enacted, public libraries could see funding reductions that total 40% from the 2001 level.



Public libraries in Ohio, and elsewhere for that matter, were established as a public good to provide ìfree public library service.î



From media conglomerates to conservative ideologues, special interest groups have been instigating for the closing of the knowledge commons, which is the free public library.



Now in Ohio, several Republican legislators are looking to shift the legal basis of free public library service, currently a part of the Ohio Code, to a fee-based model.



Of course the logic of such reform is to place public libraries in the position whereby further cuts in future budgets will be easily justified with the ownership of the funding burden placed on the public library.



Looking ahead into the fee-based logic of the free public libraryís demise in the state of Ohio, the simple answer Republic legislators would likely give is ñ ìWe gave you the permission to use the tools to raise the funding for your library. You should have used them. We are doing all we can.î



Public library supporters are attempting to instigate movement for a committee to study a replacement source of funding for the 21% cut.



The Ohio public is being sold on the flawed logic that the tax structure is the primary reason jobs are not being created in Ohio. The structure of global capitalism and the flight of capital and jobs to cheap overseas labor have little to do with the tax structure per se.



Quite simply capital is going to China to make it and India to think it, because the profits are greater.



There is no doubt that Neoliberalismís logic of privatization, free market/trade and de-regulation is creating an 80% / 20% world.



Ohio does not even seem close to realizing the full implications of an agenda that has devastated the industrial heartland.



Now only God is on our side. The machines are elsewhere. Wal-martís falling prices hammer home the fruits of good global fortune.



Overseas competition is king, because in a land like China human rights in the work place matter little.



Ohio is desperate to see the trickle up work its job-creation mojo.



In the name of getting Ohio back on track, the Republicans in Columbus are selling the Neoliberal snake oil to a tax weary public whose private sector jobs are disappearing.



Itís the global economy, of course. Capital will continue to flee, while spoils flow to the special interests.



Sensible community economic development goals that advance spaces for creative adjustment by local agency to the structure of global capitalism must become part of a critical civic instigation for cities and regions in the post-industrial world.



Floating with Cleopatra down the river of de-nile over the destructive structural force of global capital requires no rowing.



In Lakewood we need to start rowing together.





Kenneth Warren


Chuck Greanoff
Posts: 11
Joined: Mon May 02, 2005 8:16 am

Postby Chuck Greanoff » Tue May 24, 2005 2:47 pm

Sadly, the one thing "convervatives" seem to hate more than a failed government program/institution is one that works well. In this light, the assaults on Social Security and public libraries make sense.


Long Live Lakewood
Kenneth Warren
Posts: 489
Joined: Sat Mar 26, 2005 7:17 pm

Postby Kenneth Warren » Thu Jun 02, 2005 12:52 pm

Budget Update

The Ohio Senate version of the budget, released on May 24, included the following cuts to libraries:

Public library funding will be frozen at 2004 levels through December 2005, and reduced by 5% in January 2006 and continuing through June 2007.

Personal income tax will be cut 21% over the next five years (4.2% per year). In 2007, when the LLGSF returns to formula, as proposed by the Governor and agreed to by the house, this cut will reduce public library revenue streams substantially.

Longer term changes in the tangible property tax will produce another adverse impact to revenue for public libraries with levies such as Lakewood Public Library. This reduction does not hit until 2010. So there is certainly time to work out a solution to the problem.

The Senate removed the language inserted by the House of Representatives that would permit public libraries to charge fees for non-print materials.

Lakewood Public Library has been making adjustments to the expenditure side of the budget in anticipation of these reductions.

In the past, Lakewood Public Library has been ranked number #1. Budget cuts and spending reductions make it difficult, of course, to sustain #1 ranking.

We are, nonetheless, doing our best to strive for excellence and to serve our community in efficient, innovative and traditional ways.

Thank you for your efforts to communicate with legislators about the value of Ohio's public libraries.

Kenneth Warren


User avatar
Jim O'Bryan
Posts: 14109
Joined: Thu Mar 10, 2005 10:12 pm
Location: Lakewood
Contact:

Postby Jim O'Bryan » Thu Jun 02, 2005 10:27 pm

Ken

What I find troubling is when Lakewood and other cities need access to knowledge and free thinking more than ever they cut libraries.

It is almost as if they fear the free flow of knowledge, along with the ancient concept that the true center of a healthy city is the library and the unbiased knowledge flow that runs through it.

Luckily we have way to address these small cuts. Hot Tuna concerts! Cooking schools, and Lakewood Library Swag.

Ken, we have your back.


Jim


Stephen Calhoun
Posts: 208
Joined: Sat Mar 26, 2005 6:51 pm
Location: NEO
Contact:

Postby Stephen Calhoun » Fri Jun 03, 2005 8:55 am

My principal research project for 8+ years has been focused on cognitive capabilities of ordinary human beings.

This is framed variously: as a matter of ability in logic and critical thinking; flexibility; permeability; velocity; rational-emotive second order reflexivities; learning styles; ability to recognize bias, attribution and category errors, prejudices; other domains of bias- projective identification, projection; errors of reference; symbolic reasoning; constructions of meaning; folk hermenutics, formal hermeneutics; world views; semantic operations; perception; back-processing; funadamental epistemic and ontic confirmation biases; descriptive abilities; errors in modality; negative capability.

(My assessment capabilities were developed via this interdisciplinary and integral assembly of a tools set. I had to create a post-academy for myself and then was amazed to have its professors show up. This is the civic post-academy in a nutshell.)

As library funding contracts, it is my view, that advanced visions for libraries will need to obtain higher leverage points. In short, I suggest that libraries by either implementing new missions or consorting with advanced institutions, (which have yet to be created!) will derive exponential increases in "bang for the buck" by morphing into the mission of helping complete the cognitive 'schooling' of the local citizenry.

For example, a library might provide much more sophisticated facilitation aimed to help citizens navigate their resources. If somebody came to me, for example, and wished to know how to leverage Lakewood Library's collection as a syllabus for learning how to become more adept at critical thinking, it would be straightforward to provide such a syllabus.

Libraries constitute 'syllabi' in-potentia. In one sense, this is all they are in the frame of reference which poses them as post-academies.

(I've thought an ideal gig would be, for me, to be a facilitator of library navigation in specific topic areas. Libraries aren't ready to create this kind of job yet.)

I think you're right, Jim. I don't feel it is a conspiratorial effort, nevertheless, when the cognitively deficited politicians, parents, citizens, are making decisions about what constitutes education, it surprises me not that the vision of what it is to be educated is abject, and the bar is set so low.

Obviously this circles back to a vision of smart mobs in a smart community. The local scale is the right scale. I don't see a problem with post-literate starting points. One can teach scientific capability in the context of doing empirical research and in-search, without sending interested people to the 'books'. Here, I would see advanced libraries becoming highly adept in learning theories so as to better integrate institutional resources, methods, facilitation with post-academic, community-pervasive, transformational missions.

Community intelligence starts with the baselines of cognitive abilities of the community; as does self-development start with whatever is the baseline nascent, raw stuff of negative capability; as does the development of consciousness start with the baseline of yogic potential.

***

My own view is that we're up against significant shadowplay fulminated by unconscious biases in community and society. The smartest people today are largely people who don't know how smart they really are, and we're 'up against' people who aren't very smart thinking that they are geniuses.

(Philosophically...) There is always the historical current in this shadow play: the pessimistic Hobbesian view, the distortion of the ideal of the integral Athens/Jerusalem (thus of Aristotle,) and the pernicious hollowing out of liberative post-modernism via the twin drills of 'fin' decadent legacies and liberalism.

(Energetically...) If you amp the fear factor enough, the survival chakras will take over. Good for grounding, very very bad for relationship to self, community, planet, cosmos when the other chakras go to 'sleep state'.

***

The learning-how-to-learn quotient, I suggest, is about to move to the front burner. One might spend a lot of time putting bandaids on the thousand cuts. Or: spend time building moving targets, velocity, and civic martial arts capability.


Kenneth Warren
Posts: 489
Joined: Sat Mar 26, 2005 7:17 pm

Postby Kenneth Warren » Thu Jun 09, 2005 1:47 pm

Citizens efforts to convince Columbus about the importance of local government funds to Ohio's public libraries and cities is yielding fruit.

The House and Senate announced this morning that it is their intention to restore funds to local governments, including libraries. Additional revenues identified by the Office of Budget and Management will be available for the state budget. The announcement did not specify the extent of the restoration of funds.

Many thanks to all for letting Columbus how important the local funds are to libraries and cities.

Kenneth Warren



Return to “Lakewood General Discussions”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 76 guests