J Hrlec wrote:Matthew John Markling wrote:The police can then scan all your computer systems - including deleted emails - to prove your innocence. Matt
Hmm... just a little comment on the snippet above. We live in the good ole' USA, so I believe he is presumed innocent unless he is proven guilty. It seems folks here are often ready to torch people they don't agree with in other 'areas' prior to proof, and Shawn already openly stated he did not send the email.
He doesn't need to prove his innocence but I hope he definitely follows through to stop whoever may be using his address wrongly or otherwise.
Well … J Hrlec ... I think Shawn needs to come forward with more than:
Shawn Juris wrote:I had not sent you anything through email and I'm incredibly concerned about whoever is manipulating my business account in such a way. I trust that you and the rest of the Observer staff will correct this false information and do what is necessary to correct this error.
The following sure looks like it came from Shawn:
stephen davis wrote:
In any event, I do hope that this email-gate situation gets resolved soon through a speedy law enforcement investigation.
Matt