Posted: Fri Aug 15, 2008 9:46 pm
Jim,
I don't think a single person would argue with you that children benefit greatly from a broad exposure to arts and an education in appreciation. That helps create the demand that artists will fill for our children throughout their lives. Expanding educational programs is a major pillar of the CAC's mission statement.
They don't have the ability (authority or infrastructure) to create those educational programs from whole cloth, though, and there's no reason to expect that of them. By underwriting organizations like the Beck Center, they're ensuring rich educational opportunities.
The CAC funded over 50 of the 75 grants applied for in 2008. The judging criteria focusses more on things that can be quantified to some extent rather than purely on 'artistic merit', which I think we all agree is the most subjective parameter imaginable. Those that don't make the cut are likely failing in some critical aspect such as not serving a public audience or not being able to demonstrate matching funds from other sources.
If there are educational (non-school) programs out there that meet the basic criteria for application, I simply can't imagine that they wouldn't get funded.
I don't think a single person would argue with you that children benefit greatly from a broad exposure to arts and an education in appreciation. That helps create the demand that artists will fill for our children throughout their lives. Expanding educational programs is a major pillar of the CAC's mission statement.
They don't have the ability (authority or infrastructure) to create those educational programs from whole cloth, though, and there's no reason to expect that of them. By underwriting organizations like the Beck Center, they're ensuring rich educational opportunities.
The CAC funded over 50 of the 75 grants applied for in 2008. The judging criteria focusses more on things that can be quantified to some extent rather than purely on 'artistic merit', which I think we all agree is the most subjective parameter imaginable. Those that don't make the cut are likely failing in some critical aspect such as not serving a public audience or not being able to demonstrate matching funds from other sources.
If there are educational (non-school) programs out there that meet the basic criteria for application, I simply can't imagine that they wouldn't get funded.